The New York Times....

Will publish classified secrets on how our government is going after terrorists, reasoning that the reading public has a "right to know." However, the same newspaper will not publish the innocuous cartoons of prophet Muhammad that caused rioting, death threats and general mayhem amongst the barbarian Muslim crowds around the world, who think that WE have to conform to their petty sensitivities and our right of free speech should be limited by their every desire. Do you think that this cartoon is not appropriate?



Well, apparently, for New York Times readers, you do not have the "right to know" or in this case see the alleged offensive cartoons and judge for yourself. Is the New York Times more scared of the Muslim reaction to the cartoons than the increased terrorism risks that they are putting ordinary Americans under with their reckless revelations of defense secrets? Or do they have other agendas? Are they wracked by BDS? Has the paper reached such a level of flashback induced "Pinch" Sultzberger inducedmodern liberalism that they are loath to reveal something that would be considered not politically correct? Will they treat Southern Baptists with the same deference?

The New York Times is not a paper than we, as citizens of the US or as Americans, can take seriously anymore. I can't and I won't.