Christians As Perfected Jews...

Outrage, outrage all around. I love all the outrage and Ann Coulter getting all kinds of publicity for her non-politically correct recent statement that Christians are perfected Jews. Well, Christianity is essentially that in design. Christianity is founded on the principles of Judaism and attempts to make some changes or perfections to the religions. This fellow puts it in a little perspective....

It’s by their actions that I judge people. And in my experience, American Christians are essentially kind, tolerant, admirable people. I did not take Ann Coulter’s statement as an example of hate speech. Frankly, I don’t believe she has an anti-Semitic bone in her body. What I do find bizarre is that so many Jews, who side with the Arabs against Israel and whose children applauded Ahmadinejad at Columbia University, are demanding Coulter’s head on a pike.

Its so much easier to criticism and ostracise Ann Coulter but we get silence from the leftist loons when it comes to intolerant Muslims. Ann says that Christians are perfected Jews and Muslims want to kill us. I choose Ann.

The Dalai Lama And Canada....

After meeting with George W. Bush, the first time that a sitting President has met publicly with the spiritual leader, awarded him the Congressional Gold Medal, the US Congress’s highest civilian honour, the Dalai Lama went to see the Canadian Prime Minister who made him an honorary citizen of Canada. Canadians are everybody's friends and all-around nice people. Of course, the clowns that run China, never one portray themselves as nothing less that idiotic buffoons, protested the meeting...

In a statement to the daily Globe and Mail, the Chinese foreign ministry said it had also pressed Ottawa to turn him away, asking Canadian officials to "clearly understand the nature of the Dalai Lama's separatist activities."

Further, Beijing warned Ottawa to "not allow him to use Canadian territory for activities to split China, and not to do anything to harm Sino-Canadian relations."

And of course China feels compelled to continue to look stupid as chronicalled here....

The Dalai Lama’s congressional award and US visit have been condemned by Beijing, which accused Congress of “interfering in China’s internal affairs”. Last month Beijing warned Germany that bilateral ties had been damaged after Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, met the Dalai Lama in Berlin. He also met John Howard, the Australian Prime Minister, in June.

The only ones that harm Sino-Canadian relations are the Chinese themselves with their over-the-top yapping about visits from the Dalai Lama and Taiwanese officials. It always amazes me that they say the same old thing when the Dalai Lama makes his rounds... interfere in the internal affairs, blah, blah, blah. Why don't governments that invite these people tell the Chinese to shut-up? The Chinese are always meeting and supporting horrible despots around the world, sometimes interfering in the internal affairs of those places. And they also have passed legislation that one is not allowed to be reincarnated with out permission from the Chinese Government...

The Dalai Lama’s US visit comes amid growing tensions between Beijing and Tibetan monks after China introduced new laws on reincarnation, an important element of Buddhist faith. Beijing said last month that living Buddhas are no longer allowed to be reincarnated without permission from the atheist Communist Government.

But even more scary than the idiotic comments by brain-dead Chinese officials is this quote from the article...

"It was clearly an historic meeting," said Jason Kenney, secretary of state for multiculturalism.

"I hope that the entire world gets the message that attacking a 72-year-old pacifist Buddhist monk who advocates nothing more than cultural autonomy for his people is counterproductive."

My God, Canada has a Secretary of State for Multiculturalism? How did something as silly as this come about? The nicest people on Earth are also becoming the most silly with this kind of thing.

Time To Add My Voice To SCHIP.....

The disturbing crap that goes on in Washington and enabled by a left-leaning press makes me worry about the future of my nation. Creeping European style socialism will destroy the community fabric of America and I do not think that modern times will treat socialist nations very well over the upcoming intermediate time periods.

Now for SCHIP, a popular health insurance program for children was passed congress in 1997- Newt Gingrich was speaker of the House at that time- with bipartisan support. Apparently, legislation now has a sunset that does not allow these programs to live forever without review. I think that this is smart. In fact, Republicans were bigger House supporters of this program than the minority Democrats, as more Democrats voted against this program, 45 than Republicans, 31. But this could have been since Democrats may have thought that it didn't give away too much or may have been voting against other parts of the bill. But these are the facts, facts that you would never ever see the media dredge up and question the Democrats about.

But lets make sure we understand the issues and history before we listen to Nancy Pelosi and the sound-bite media....

SCHIP does not cover the "poor" in the USA. The "poor" are covered under a program called Medicaid. Medicaid, unlike the fully Federally funded Medicare that covers adults, is only partially Federally funded and is designed to be administered by States depending upon where the States think their needs are.

SCHIP covers the "working poor" or those that do not make enough to buy insurance on their own if it is not employer provided and those with incomes above the thresholds to be covered under Medicaid. In most States, a family of 4 earning up to $37,700 per year ($41,000 per year today) would qualify to be covered by the SCHIP program as passed by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Undocumented children, such as those of illegal immigrants are not covered under SCHIP, but this decision is left up to the States that can choose to cover undocumented illegal alien children out of their own State treasuries. But these people were not covered under the original Title XXI SCHIP program.

So, what did the Democrats do? They tried to substantially increase the program and held the original program hostage to the huge step towards socializing medicine. The dangerous step by the Democrats is viewed as a win-win for them politically. If the Republican caved to this changed, then will have achieved a gigantic step towards socializing medicine, a long-term goal and if the Republican kept their senses, then they will be able to batter Republicans with class warfare soundbites accusing them of not caring about the health of "poor" people (but of course, these aren't the 'poor' that most people think about).

So what did the program that was vetoed by President Bush promise to give away? Essentially it was designed to more than double the program, from US$5 billion a year to US$12 billion a year by raising the eligibility from 6.6 million children to 10 million, an increase of 3.4 million.

The increased costs would be 'paid' for by increasing Federal taxes on cigarettes by 61 cents a pack. Of course Democrats increase taxes to pay for stuff and never consider cutting other programs. So they will pay for this with a gigantic regressive tax on smokers. Of course, the States would have to have provided additional funds out of their treasury to meet their funding obligations on the expanded program. Either creating higher taxes or the need to reduce other programs for the unfunded part of their Federal mandate.

The original vetoed SCHIP program, allowed for an expansion of the program to children of families with incomes as high as $84,000 per year for a family of 4, clearly not in the poor territory. Also, as the income level increases, greater percentages of children are already covered by employer programs. Some children are moved away from employer paid programs to SCHIP in these scenarios for different coverage options or to save family expenses associated with co-pay and other program costs as discussed here....

In a 2007 analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, researchers determined that "for every 100 children who gain coverage as a result of SCHIP, there is a corresponding reduction in private coverage of between 25 and 50 children." The CBO speculates this is because the state programs offer better benefits at lower cost to enrollees than the private alternatives.[9] A Cato Institute briefing paper estimated the "crowding out" of private insurers by the public program could be as much as 60%

. So the effectiveness of raising the limits decreases at higher and higher income levels. This is really showing the program for what it is, a shift towards socialized medicine and not a full-fledged attempt to cover needy children.

I honestly did not know the SCHIP program even existed, at a cost of $5 billion a year and covering 6.6 million children, it seems to be a very small and manageable program. However, since this program is now the bus used by the Democrats to drive socialized healthcare, then i am now against it. Democrats are only using this program and the children it covers to expand socialized medicine. and since I am a militant opposer to socialized dumbed down medicine, I am now completely against this program. Democrats have ruined a program that was originally designed for the needy and is now a political football. Shame on them.

Buy The Phony Soldier Condemnation On EBAY...

The silliness that comes from Democrats is mystifying. 41 Democrat Senators signed a letter condemning Rush Limbaugh, a US private citizen, for his on-air comments regarding soldiers quoted and peddled by the US leftist media that were in actuality not what they claim to be. There are several examples where shoddy reporting quoted soldiers that were in-fact not present or not involved in the conflicts or situations that they were used as sources for. These soldiers could have been easily vetted by the media so that these situations where these so-called witness/soldiers could have been checked out and verified. But the media, never one to miss a chance to bash President Bush, the Iraq war or Republicans in general, choose to publish these questionable stories instead of vetting their reliability. The fake-but-true stories and opinions peddled by the media as real news is what buried Dan Rather.

So the main story here is that Rush Limbaugh, when describing one of these soldiers as, rightly, a 'phony soldier' came under attack by the left-leading organization called Media Matters, that typically pours over comments made principally by Republicans and conservatives and is not beyond taking these comments completely out-of-context. In a pique of silliness, Democrats in the Senate took this falsehood and wrote a condemnation letter to Rush that was signed by 41 of the more deranged senators, a great use of their time. Maybe its good that they spend time to do things like this so that they don't do any other damage.

You can now buy this document on EBAY. The price is up over $60,000 (US) at the time of this writing. All proceeds will go to a charity to support the college educations of children whose fathers were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. And maybe one can purchase this and place next to their copy of the constitution.

Qoute Of The Day....

Quote: Property is organized robbery.

Author: George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950, Irish-born British Dramatist

Thisw is so appropriate for Hong Kong.

I Am Back In The US For A Visit......

And to honor Al Gore's award of the Nobel Peace prize, I will drive an extra 10 miles in my SUV.

So, what is Al Gore getting the Peace Prize for? I thought that global warming was science? NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! Al Gore gets awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its impact on world peace? Wow. Kind of like awarding Yasir Arafat the Nobel Peace Prize while he continued to aid and support the killing of Jews in Israel by his Jihadi terrorist organizations. So what is with all of this? The last American to win the Nobel Peace Prize was Jimmy Carter in 2002, the same guy that writes outrageous books about apartheid in Israel and has become probably the strangest former President in his commentary that has ever existed. Nobel awarders commented that the award to the strange Jimmy Carter, was a 'shot across the bow, to George W. Bush for his 'planning' the war in Iraq. So, its really a political prize?

As we know, the weather changes constantly and will change even if

So, what is it about this Nobel Peace Prize? Its about politics? YESSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!! So the Nobel Prize isn't about the best in a field but about politics? Why do they call it the Peace Prize when its a Political Prize?

Nobel, that his money in the dynamite business, and his name have been degraded into another simple political organization and not to be trusted trusted for delivering awards to the best. Its kind of like Oscar night. Where its all about celebrity and nothing to do with talent.

Terrorism Is An Integral Part Of Islam....

Or so some say, here.

Neo-Communist....

Neo-Communist, Hillary Clinton has said these interesting things....

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
Hillary Clinton
June 29, 2004

"It’s time to replace an 'on your own' society with one based on 'shared responsibility and prosperity.'"
Hillary Clinton
May 29, 2007

"The same with energy. You know, we can’t keep talking about our dependence on foreign oil and the need to deal with global warming and the challenge that it poses to our climate and to God’s creation and just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
Hillary Clinton
June 5, 2007

"I want to take those profits. And I want to put them into a strategic energy fund..."
Hillary Clinton
February 2, 2007

"...It would help narrow the gap between the rich and those who don't have enough savings... We have to fight and finally bury the idea of privatizing Social Security."
Hillary Clinton
October 9, 2007

It amazes me that people would allow or even desire that our government take even more of their hard earned dollars to dole them out to people as these officials desire. Karl Marx would be very very proud.

Also, there is something else to keep in mind, this desire to transfer wealth is not to benefit the "poor" but typically is targeted at middle class voters. Its a get something for nothing mentality where these politicians sell that they can more effectively, efficiently and/or equitably deliver goods and services better than its done now by the private sector. Its ridiculous.

Just look at Social Security. Designed during the Depression in the 1930's to assist indigent elderly people that lost their life savings when banks where their savings were, collapsed, has been transformed into a gigantic wealth transfer payment system from working people to the most wealthy generational group in the world, or in the history of the world. In the meantime, this scheme promises to pay benefits to the people paying today that has a negative present value of around US$45 trillion. Anyone with half a brain knows that there is no way that benefits as they are being currently doled out to the fat and wealthy elderly in US today will be paid to the working people paying these taxes today. Thanks Democrats for all that you have done for us. But I don't need nor want your help and please do not promise assist someone else while requiring me to pay for it.

Quote Of The Day...

Hilarious quote. There are a group of citizen volunteers that police the net for crazy Muslim jihadi web-sites that post barbaric and bloody videos of beheadings, the killing of American servicemen and are used to promote violent jihad and reports them to ISP providers to have them shut down. This is like the citizen-net Minutemen...

Asked why he does it, "Mr. Shackleford" said, "Because my wife won't let me go shoot them."

Ha ha ha. Let's roll.

The Disaster For the Democrats....

This is something that I have been thinking for a quite some time, particularly while military deaths were going through their increase this past Spring, what would the bloviating Democrats do if military deaths starts to decrease as we see now? The hard facts are, that US military deaths have been declining and despite Iraq still being a mess, in the hands of barbarian Muslim crazies, It appears as if the military and the Iraqis have a grip on the troubles facing them. The decline in US military deaths for the past 4 months should be a victory but it is also a disaster, a disaster for the Democrats.

Iraq Coalition Casualties

The Democrats, who desire that our boys keep dying in Iraq, primarily as a tool to keep clubbing Bush and as a foil to run against Republicans next November. But that awful stance may backfire in their yellow faces if the military actually wins in Iraq. So Democrats, the party of US defeat, may actually not achieve their goals of getting beaten in the conflict in Iraq. Democrats are nto interested in protecting the US and couldn't give a hoot what-so-ever to prosecute or win the war on terror, but deign to gain a toehold so that they can can create some monstrous health care plan that offers economic risk that may destroy the US or allows them to micro-manage health care policy to the extent that no normal human would ever desire. The Democrats are most interested in socialist economic policies and that revolves around controlling healthcare and eventually through the idiotic global warming, regulating nearly everything we do.

In case there was any debate, amongst those that do not know me at all, and I do not encourage any of this kind of silly debate since I will never, ever vote for a Democrat as long as I live. I say, and want to be clear, that I cannot stand Democrats and have almost no respect for them or their socialist populist policies. Furthermore, I think that they should all go screw themselves, where they would do at least someone some little bit of good for at least themselves. And you European brain-dead bozos, go screw yourselves too. If you don't like fighting barbarian Arabs, go to the moon where you all can feel at home.

Twenty-five Signs You Have Grown Up....

1. Your houseplants are alive, and you can’t smoke any of them.
2. Having sex in a twin bed is out of the question.
3. You keep more food than beer in the fridge.
4. 6:00 AM is when you get up, not when you go to bed.
5. You hear your favorite song in an elevator.
6. You watch the Weather Channel.
7. Your friends marry and divorce instead of “hook up” and “breakup.”
8. You go from 130 days of vacation time to 14.
9. Jeans and a sweater no longer qualify as “dressed up.”
10. You’re the one calling the police because those %&@# kids next door won’t turn down the stereo.
11. Older relatives feel comfortable telling sex jokes around you.
12. You don’t know what time Taco Bell closes anymore.
13. Your car insurance goes down and your car payments go up.
14. You feed your dog “Science Diet” instead of McDonald’s leftovers.
15. Sleeping on the couch makes your back hurt.
16. You take naps.
17. Dinner and a movie is the whole date instead of the beginning of one.
18. Eating a basket of chicken wings at three in the morning would severely upset, rather than settle, your stomach.
19. You go to the drug store for ibuprofen and antacid, not condoms and pregnancy tests.
20. A four dollar bottle of wine is no longer “pretty good shit.”
21. You actually eat breakfast food at breakfast time.
22. “I just can’t drink the way I used to” replaces “I’m never going to drink that much again.”
23. Ninety percent of the time you spend in front of a computer is for real work.
24. You drink at home to save money before going to a bar.
25. When you find out your friend is pregnant you congratulate them instead of asking “Oh shit what the hell happened?”

Bonus:

26: You read this entire list looking desperately for one sign that it doesn’t apply to you and can’t find one to save your sorry old ass.

Here Is An Illustration On Why The Media Can No Longer Be Trusted.....

Here is another fine example of the press -a press with an agenda instead of fulfilling their mandate of reporting news- failing to report on a significant change in what is going on in Iraq. The liberal press is invested in failure in Iraq to support Democrats that want to fail in Iraq as a political wedge against GW Bush and Republicans. For Democrats and the press, its all about getting elected, not what is best for America or the world at large.



These 2 reporters argue why this 'positive' news should not be reported for various reasons. What follows is a partial transcript of this segment....

HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: The news from Iraq has been consistently depressing for several years now, a continuous tableau of death and destruction. But when the administration released more positive casualty figures this week, the media paid little attention. A couple of sentences on the "CBS EVENING NEWS" and NBC "NIGHTLY NEWS," The New York Times ran it on page 10, The Washington Post," page 14, USA Today page 16. The L.A. Times, a couple of paragraphs at the bottom of a page 4 story.

One exception was Charlie Gibson, who made it the lead story on ABC's "WORLD NEWS."

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CHARLES GIBSON, ABC ANCHOR: The U.S. military reports the fourth straight month of decline in troop deaths, 66 American troops died in September, each a terrible tragedy for a family, but the number far less than those who died in August. And the Iraqi government says civilian deaths across Iraq fell by half last month.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KURTZ: Joining us now to put this into perspective, Robin Wright, who covers national security for The Washington Post. And CNN Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr.

Robin Wright, should that decline in Iraq casualties have gotten more media attention?

ROBIN WRIGHT, THE WASHINGTON POST: Not necessarily. The fact is we're at the beginning of a trend -- and it's not even sure that it is a trend yet. There is also an enormous dispute over how to count the numbers. There are different kinds of deaths in Iraq.

There are combat deaths. There are sectarian deaths. And there are the deaths of criminal -- from criminal acts. There are also a lot of numbers that the U.S. frankly is not counting. For example, in southern Iraq, there is Shiite upon Shiite violence, which is not sectarian in the Shiite versus Sunni. And the U.S. also doesn't have much of a capability in the south.

So the numbers themselves are tricky. Long-term, General Odierno, who was in town this week, said he is looking for irreversible momentum, and that, after two months, has not yet been reached.

KURTZ: Barbara Starr, CNN did mostly quick reads by anchors of these numbers. There was a taped report on "LOU DOBBS TONIGHT." Do you think this story deserved more attention? We don't know whether it is a trend or not but those are intriguing numbers.

BARBARA STARR, CNN PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: But that's the problem, we don't know whether it is a trend about specifically the decline in the number of U.S. troops being killed in Iraq. This is not enduring progress. This is a very positive step on that potential road to progress.

KURTZ: But let's say that the figures had shown that casualties were going up for U.S. soldiers and going up for Iraqi civilians. I think that would have made some front pages.

STARR: Oh, I think inevitably it would have. I mean, that's certainly -- that, by any definition, is news. Look, nobody more than a Pentagon correspondent would like to stop reporting the number of deaths, interviewing grieving families, talking to soldiers who have lost their arms and their legs in the war. But, is this really enduring progress?

We've had five years of the Pentagon telling us there is progress, there is progress. Forgive me for being skeptical, I need to see a little bit more than one month before I get too excited about all of this.

This interview with these individual reporters is terrible on so many levels. It shows that they are willing to argue against reason with unreasonable and erroneous arguments. It is evil and sick.

Thanks you Starr for your being skeptical and not subjecting us to some kind of potential positive story coming out of Iraq. But Starr, your job is to report what is going on. And you are not doing that and admittedly you would have reported that if deaths were rising, that that would have been reported, probably breathlessly.

Furthermore, one month of declines is not a trend as argued by the journalists, but it has been a decline of 4 months from the peak in May. So, these journalists do not even know the facts of what should be reported.

Also, what is all this bullshit about all of these other deaths? That can be reported too but it is only addressed as questions. Reporters are supposed to get this data and report it. If it can be shown as a counter-trend to other trends, then that can be effectively used as a argument or illustration. But to say that a decline in US military deaths is only part of the story does not mean that it isn't newsworthy.

Why do these clowns even have jobs?

Terrorists Funniest Bloopers....

Computer Technology....

Another Benefit To Boozing....

As reporting in Scientific American, drinking alchohol can actually enhance certain cognitive abilities...

"There are human epidemiological data of others indicating that mild [to] moderate drinking may paradoxically improve cognition in people compared to abstention," says Maggie Kalev, a research fellow in molecular medicine and pathology at the University of Auckland in New Zealand and a co-author of an article in The Journal of Neuroscience describing results of a study she and other researchers performed on rats. "This is similar to a glass of wine protecting against heart disease, however the mechanism is different."

In additional to increased cognitive abilities, I find that alchohol makes me funnier, more handsome, charming, more coordinated, able to stay up later and a host of other things.

Another Weird Hong Kong Mall Experience....

I went into IFC Mall yesterday and stopped by the sign that lists the stores in the building. I intended on taking my son to buy some sports shoes and some IFC employee asked me if I wanted some help. Our conversation went something like this....

Me: I am looking for a sporting goods store to buy my son some shoes.
IFC: We don't sell anything for children.
Me: Well, he is 12 years old and bigger than you, so he can use adult sizes. I just want to see where you have a sporting goods store or shoe store.
IFC: We don't have any of those here.
Me: You don't have any shoe stores?
IFC: No.
Me: You don't have have any sporting goods stores?
IFC: No.
Me: You don't have any stores with such a basic things as shoes or sporting goods?
IFC: No.
Me: You don't have any stores for normal humans?
IFC: No.

So, there you have it. Another useless place. Nothing for you to buy here. "Please Leave NOW!!!!!"

It kind of reminds me of Pacific Place, probably one of the most useless facilities in Hong Kong built for the intended purpose of selling goods to people that want to buy them. I went cruising through there recently since it provides and easy access to such useful facilities as the MTR, Companies Registration Office and Hong Kong Park where one can look at the turtles climbing on each other.

Pacific place has closed its food court, kicked out McDonalds and has upgraded its collection of stores to only 'high end' brands, thereby eliminating such places that sell goods to the uncool, not-to-trendy and those that need to eat on a regular basis. It appears as if they are trying to retarget the place to the PRC China buy-anything-expensive crowd where top-priced goods are derigor for these vapid individuals. Of course I noticed that this Pacific Place retargeting was somewhat successful since there were around 15-20 people squatting in various places around the mall. AS one knows, PRC people come to Hong Kong and when they get tired squat with their friends, talk loudly, smoke cigarettes, eat food that ends up all over the place and create a general nuisance. It just made me think that maybe that Pacific Place management should create squatting pens like smokers have smoking rooms in airports so that they can be contained into easy to clean areas. And maybe placing spittoons at various intervals may make some sense since this squatting crowd is also the spitting crowd and spit on the highly polished floors of Pacific Place could lead to some slippery accidents and injuries.

Well, I guess that since I am not a PRC China brand name junky, then there is no reason for me to go to Pacific Place anymore. There are plenty of other places to go to buy the things for "Normal People."

Sensible Iranians?

Following are excerpts from an address delivered by Hasan Rahimpur Azghadi of the Iranian Supreme Council for Cultural Revolution, which aired on Jaam-e Jam 1 TV on September 3, 2007.

Hasan Rahimpur Azghadi: [The Westerners] have transgressed all moral boundaries, and that is why their family unit has collapsed. When modesty and chastity are abandoned, soon enough the family falls apart. The husband and wife are no longer satisfied with one another, and they begin having relations with other men and women.

After a while, they start thinking that since they have already experienced this, it is time to try homosexuality. Then, they think this is old-fashioned, and they turn to animals. These things happen in the West. After a while, when they get bored with this, they turn to small children.

Today, one of the most prosperous and lucrative trades in the world is the trafficking in sex slaves – mostly women and small children. They trade small children like slaves and use them for sex. They are worse than the most monstrous beasts in history. They have even developed theories about this. Throughout history, people did these vile things, but they never discussed it in public. They always did it in secret. These people raise their head up high, and admit that they do these things. They have now begun turning to objects. There are big factories that produce artificial genitals, and they sell them in stores. A sex shop is a store that sells sex toys.

So, the moral decline in the West has, according to this unbalanced Muslim, lead to adultery, then homosexuality, then sex with animals, then child molestation, then sex slavery then ultimately.... the use of sex toys.

Of course Muslims have solutions to these problems, Iranians hang homosexuals that presumably breaks the chain of decline to sex toys. And in the event that someone (a Muslim) is concerned that one's children may eventually participate in bad behavior (of course this only applies to women, men are never treated this way) the Muslim daddy can perform the typical Arab honor killing. Preferable, I suppose, as I have read, is to slice the child's throat and bury them in the garden. This is presumably preferable then to allow them to decline to sex toy use. This is the mentality of these sickos that we are dealing with. Kill their own children, slap on a suicide vest and blow themselves up in crowded buses and cafes and multitudes of other barbaric sins.

Maybe this is the answer to our Iranian and Arab problem?

The Increasingly Strange Left....

Its amazing the garbage that gets peddled to our youth in the US as free-speech. Its ok to have a maniacal dictator speak at the University, but when the Minutemen tried to speak there, they had to escape due to the risk of violence from the crowds as the angry and crazed crowd stormed the stage and punched and kicked people. This is definitely not free speech when one group gets to use the podium and when the other group does not and some are silenced due to the threat of violence from these crazy students.



How is it more politically correct to have a crazy Muslim killer speak to 'explain' himself than having a volunteer group that is attempting to take positive actions to guard our borders communicate what and why they are doing what they are doing? I argue that the Mad Muslim Mullahs of Iran would be happy and satisfied to kill our children attending these universities whereas the Minutemen seek to guard our legal borders as a small step towards protecting all the people that live within the borders of the US.

Its amazing to me how far Left my former hometown of New York and the universities in the US have drifted and how disgusting and dangerous that the Left has become. The Left in the US is dangerous, angry and violent. My Dad once suggested that i go campaign in New york and I told him that I did not want to since I feared violence. New york and the dangerous liberals that live there are the Left's equivalent of the KKK, threatening violence. The Left has become a danger to people like the crazy Muslims have always been. Democrats do not condemn these kinds of actions and the press does little to cover such outbursts that have become typical. I have very no respect for the Left, the useless Press and the Democrats.

The Dumb Blond Comments On The Crazy Iranians Visit To The Weirdos At Columbia Univeristy....

Cantonese Rap About Dim Sum....